Bad buying experience

General chit chat, jokes, etc

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
fastrider
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 4:33 pm
TIPEC membership: 0

Bad buying experience

Post by fastrider »

Stupidly bought my first Porsche from a trader to find that the advert wasn't accurate - stating an accessory was fitted - when it wasn't... Anyone know the best course of action as the trader is not interested in addressing the issue?
User avatar
tr7v8
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 12848
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 7:43 pm
TIPEC membership: 4190
Location: Chatham, Kent

Re: Bad buying experience

Post by tr7v8 »

fastrider wrote:Stupidly bought my first Porsche from a trader to find that the advert wasn't accurate - stating an accessory was fitted - when it wasn't... Anyone know the best course of action as the trader is not interested in addressing the issue?
More info would be useful, but not the traders name. What model, what is the accessory?
Jim

http://tipec.net/region_southeastlondon.php

2018 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV
2005 Porsche Cayenne S SOLD
2000 Jeep Grand Cherokee SOLD
2010 Mazda MX5 Mk3.5 2.0 Sport Tech SOLD
2000 Porsche Boxster S SOLD
1987 Porsche 944
2019 Abarth 595C
fastrider
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2015 4:33 pm
TIPEC membership: 0

Re: Bad buying experience

Post by fastrider »

Thanks for guidance, not easy situation for me. 911 996 1999 GT3look, headlamp washers is the issue, advert said they had 'em, I never checked I admit, I'm told a few hundred quid to put them on...
JasonGibson
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1513
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 11:00 am
TIPEC membership: 0
Location: Kingston upon thames

Re: Bad buying experience

Post by JasonGibson »

I know that some dealers online descriptions of options are incorrect as they seem to use a generic listing related to the model.

Assuming you viewed before buying, you had the ability to see any visible options,
not sure n your rights but personally headlamp washers wouldn't be a deal breaker if i found a good car.
Cayenne S 4.5 06 Basalt Black
924S 87 Guards Red
924S 87 Alpine White Sold
Boxster 2.7 Silver 00 Sold
Boxster S Meridian 01 Sold
928 S2 Prussian Blue 86 Sold
993 C4 Arena Red 97 Sold
sam
Posts: 4904
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:16 am
TIPEC membership: 993
Location: Emsworth Hants

Re: Bad buying experience

Post by sam »

jasongibson wrote:I know that some dealers online descriptions of options are incorrect as they seem to use a generic listing related to the model.

Assuming you viewed before buying, you had the ability to see any visible options,
not sure n your rights but personally headlamp washers wouldn't be a deal breaker if i found a good car.

Plus one
User avatar
Greggers
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 7:22 pm
TIPEC membership: 7458
Location: Wimborne

Re: Bad buying experience

Post by Greggers »

You've got the car and he's got your money.

I think you'd have a struggle getting anything out of him now - these are bargaining points before you cough up.

Having said that, I'd take a view on the real-world difference not having the washers is making to your car, and whether you really want to spend that much on a retro-fit, or expect him to return that much to you as 'compensation' ...

Hope you can resolve it happily.

G
'89 944 S2 Cabriolet
Aprilia "Falcuono" road weapon, KTM LC4 400E Desert Special for desert adventures, an RD350LC nostalgia generator and an RG500 mortgage extender.
village eejit
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 11:43 am
TIPEC membership: 4941
Location: Banbury

Re: Bad buying experience

Post by village eejit »

996s with headlight washers are a PITA to remove the headlight assembly if you need to change a lamp. The corner of the headlight that they protrude through invariably gets damaged as the washer jet remains in place and you have to try to lift the headlight assembly over it when it is only designed to slide forward and not up.

I prefer dirty headlights to cracked corners any day, so look on the bright side, Terry Tibbs might have done you a favour by making up the options list!
Steve

986 Boxster S
F355 Challenge Evocation
F355 Spider Evocation
Audi A4 Avant 2.0TDI S-Line
PaulSmith
Posts: 679
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 6:40 pm
TIPEC membership: 666
Location: Northants
Contact:

Re: Bad buying experience

Post by PaulSmith »

Surely this is an April Fool? :?
Paul Smith - Northants
90 944 S2 Black
User avatar
briggy
Posts: 426
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:56 pm
TIPEC membership: 7008
Location: Gloucestershire

Re: Bad buying experience

Post by briggy »

Basically, under the Sale Of Goods Act (1979, I think), the goods have to be "as described". If not, you are entitled to a refund i.e. you reject the car. In reality though, you can't get blood out of a stone. If the trader won't play ball, you need to look at taking him to the small claims court. It's a cheap and painless process, you don't need a solicitor, but there are limits to the amount you can claim. You also need to weight up the costs against the gains. If you lose, you'll have to stand your costs, which may be more than retrofitting the missing parts.

Also, is it "reasonable" to reject a car on such relatively trivial grounds? It's not like he's sold you a 944 Lux which was advertised as a 944 Turbo.

Think you're going to have to put this one down to experience.....

Caveat emptor.
First car : 1979 Porsche 928 (Matchbox)
Previous car : 1990 Porsche 944 Cab
Current cars : 987.2 Porsche Cayman S
sam
Posts: 4904
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:16 am
TIPEC membership: 993
Location: Emsworth Hants

Re: Bad buying experience

Post by sam »

briggy wrote:Basically, under the Sale Of Goods Act (1979, I think), the goods have to be "as described". If not, you are entitled to a refund i.e. you reject the car. In reality though, you can't get blood out of a stone. If the trader won't play ball, you need to look at taking him to the small claims court. It's a cheap and painless process, you don't need a solicitor, but there are limits to the amount you can claim. You also need to weight up the costs against the gains. If you lose, you'll have to stand your costs, which may be more than retrofitting the missing parts.

Also, is it "reasonable" to reject a car on such relatively trivial grounds? It's not like he's sold you a 944 Lux which was advertised as a 944 Turbo.

Think you're going to have to put this one down to experience.....

Caveat emptor.
Except about the same financial differential! As has been said several times already in this thread, if its the right car, washers are small beer!
Post Reply