J.J. wrote:
Seems a bit pointless as my 2.5 lux can out gun that! There are so many used engines about with the scrap age scheme at the moment. In turbo form could be interesting. It's from the same family at least. Some would say it was the right engine!

Still not convinced about the LS lump. A lot of steel in that engine & the yanks aren't great on keeping it light. Think it will be a bit agricultural....Would have liked to see you sort the super charger Jim. Still if you go for it we will know soon enough. All the Yank engines I've come across have been a bit crude from an engineering point of view.
How many ll's in bollox? The Chevy is a state of the art engine using ally blocks (most not all). e.g. the Chevy can offer DOD which is displacement on demand i.e. switching cylinders off when the performance isn't needed to get fuel economy, never seen that offered on a VAG lump. And around 20 or so lbs heavier than a 944 lump. Quite why you consider it could be agricultural I have no idea.
The maintenance of the Audi still needs cambelts & has massive complexity with completely integrated ECUs which talk to half the world, the Chevy one does but there are lots of people who have sorted that. The 20V VAG lump I'm pretty sure is Iron blocked, it is very old dating from the 80's. Some of the more recent engines aren't exactly fantastic engineering AKA the VR6. I've never bought into the aren't VW's wonderful because they aren't. My experience with anything VAG is bits are damned expensive as well. As for keeping it in the family the 944 lump has no commonality with VAG whatsoever and that includes a Boxster.