TR7V8, I have a bit of an amateur interest in tribology, having ties to friends who run their own companies within the industry. This is a subject that interests me a great deal, so this post may well drag on a bit…
I certainly wouldn't use such a broad sweeping statement as "all NASP engines do not need a fully synthetic oil". Firstly, the extended service intervals are purely down to the fact that the additive packages contained within synth oils work for longer before breaking down - a 20w50 grade that's been in an engine for 10k miles will be doing pretty much nothing to protect the white metal bearings and other load points where you have metal to metal contact, hence the short service intervals associated with this grade. Secondly, it is a common misconception that just because a modern Vauxhall Vectra can run for 20,000 miles between servicing that the same should apply to a classic car. Bluntly, it doesn’t. By modern standards, a 944 engine is a very dirty engine. So, whilst you still get the benefits of the better ZDDP package, decreased levels of friction and a greater shore rating which a fully synthetic oil provides, the contaminants will still build up in the sump more quickly due to dated engine technology being incapable of such a clean burn as our afore mentioned Vauxhall Vectra. Thus, despite the fact that the ZDDP package will still be working as efficiently as when the oil was first poured into the top of the engine, fully synthetic oil used in a classic type engine WILL require an oil change every 6000 to 7000 miles anyway since by this point the oil in the sump will have reached saturation point with carbon deposits. So, this brings us neatly onto the next bone of contention; whilst the use of a fully synthetic oil has extended the service interval of our engine by 50%, A bottle of fully synthetic oil is still nearly 4 times the cost of a 20w50 grade. Whether it will have extended the life of the internal components sufficiently to justify the extra cost of the more expensive oil in the first place is a matter of debate and I suspect one that would not be resolved without bench testing two engines back to back. So, ultimately, the cost vs reward is left to the individual to decide upon for themselves. Certainly if we were talking about an engine on the scale such as those that power a ship, then the cost of extra expense on maintenance is definitely worth it vs the cost of a rebuild. However, on an old car engine which is comparatively cheap to rebuild, then arguably, the use of a fully synthetic oil is unnecessary.
To argue that synthetic oils have “no more detergent properties than a base mineral oil” is incorrect. It all depends on the additive package that the manufacture adds to their base oil to create each blend. However, you are correct in that oils blended for diesel engines have higher detergent properties – different blends for different intended applications.
For these reasons, again, I would have to take a contrary stance to your opinion that fully synthetic oils do not promote leaks - the fact is, on an older engine, they will! Over time with the effect of continuous heat cycles the seals and gaskets used on all the mating surfaces of an engine will shrink. Gaps around these seals are then plugged with sludge and carbon deposits that inherently exist in dirty engines such as the engines we have in our cars. To introduce fully synthetic oil with its associated detergent properties to such an engine will cause this sludge to dissociate from where it was happily sitting. The absence of these sludge deposits now results in leaky seals around mating surfaces.
So, in a roundabout way, let’s go back to the original question that started this thread and expand upon it slightly; There are two types of engines to consider: New build and an engine in current service.
On a *New build* I would advocate running in on mineral oil and then switching to a fully synthetic oil. The decreased friction will free up a couple of horsepower for starters and the enhanced ZDDP package will protect your engine better whilst running and much better on start-up which is actually when most of the damage to a bearing surface is cause.
For an engine which is currently in service (and of more relevance to the author of the thread) it would help to know what it has been run on previously. If it has been run on mineral oil all it’s life then the use of fully synth oil as previously mentioned will cause sludge deposits to block oil galleries starving the top end of oil and create leaks. Unless it is known for certain that an old engine has been run on fully synthetic oil for its whole life then it absolutely should not be use in an old engine – it will only create problems. We are in agreement, therefore, that an older engine should only be run on 20w/50 mineral oil or a part synthetic 10w/40. However, I certainly wouldn’t worry about “mixing viscosities” between a part synth and a mineral oil since both oils are blended from the same base stocks anyway. It was fairly common practice before the introduction of so called multi grade oils to use oils with varying viscosities depending on the time of year.
As a closing point that may be of interest to members who, unlike you and I, are not “spanner men”; you rightly mention that a lot of these cars are used purely as toys. I would just like to pick up on that point for a second in that an engine certainly should NEVER be left with used oil in it over a long period of time irrespective of the grade! If a car is to be left unused for a lengthy period of time, then an oil change should be done just prior to it going into hibernation – the deposits in used oil turn it slightly acidic. This acid oil over time will eat it’s way through white metal bearings – the very things you pour your oil in to protect! The fresh oil free from contaminants will then protect the engine internals without causing damage. Cheers,
Jon.
_________________ -JC Current cars: Expired Jag XJ6 - currently being used as an ornament. '85 944 LUX (on loan from pixie*porsche 'til something catches my eye) '81 MG BGT - Enough power to strip the skin off a rice pudding... just...
|