Li Moo Bai wrote:
I think that's internet hearsay. The 1.6 is just as likely. Ask the missus

Same goes for a mates lass (with a 1.4 actually).
Also I had a look at another one recently, for a possible snotter for me/us, and it had come in for a gasket at the usual 50-60k. I'm afraid they fail like clockwork. But as I said above, it is not in itself a reason to reject a car.
I know of some that have done 120K plus never been touched, others at around 20K or so. The design is a bit poor in that the thermostat faces the other way to most cars so maybe something to do with warm up cycles. I know Ford were less than impressed when they bought LR & got the Freelander. If a HG failed then the dealers used to swap the engine & a lot of the "new uprated" stuff was done by Ford engineers to fix it.
I remember when I was building the TR7 lump, I was at Progress Engineering & a guy came in with a 1.4 that they were buying for bits. Apparently female owner had hit another car up the ar5e & crunched the rad. Police came out & sorted the details & owner asks copper if it's OK to drive home around 14 miles

. Reputedly the copper ignores the antifreeze mix all over the place & says yes! It was glowing by the time she got home

Talking to Simon he said they TIG the heads up, skim them & rebuild 'em & had never seen one back.