dekandgord wrote:
ah I also used to read "Campaign"magazine.
I have no problem with well made well thought out ads, I struggle with the ideas that are lazy, the idea that celebrity will sell, I know it does but by god I wish it didnt. The most annoying are the generic euro ads, the cillit bangs of this world when you dont see mouths move. I know we all have the hierarchy of needds but god please sell me my wants in an imaginative style, i may just reach self actualization but not by using something advertised by Barry soddin Scott especially if it has boswellox in it.
I love the origional tango campaign, The ongoing gold blend withe bloke from buffy was fantastic. Some of the abstracts have been great. So dont get me wrong it is just the moronic stuff that annoys me, the stuff where no real thought or creation has happened and the appeal is the lowest common denominator that can be found. Oh and the concentration on yooooof is a bit of a pain as well.
Also the demographics that some agencies seem to think are watching stuff amazes me, It would appear you can sit down to watch "great scania's of the 70's" and you still have ads for tampons and hair care stuff, who the hell is paying for these slots? thay have to be free fillers dont they????????
oh and i was secretly pleased when Saatchi's wharehouse full of junk burnt down, and his wife cant cook either. But that is just a personal dislike from the late 70's and 80's, mind you "labour isnt working"was brilliant
I love theoretical physics and astro physics, always have done, I never had the maths to do it though
So I did Philosophy.
Fantastic - a chat on a car forum about one of my other passions - this is why I love TIPEC!
Gordon we should have a good chat at some future event where we're both attending but briefly:
- you will learn very little about advertising - and be seriously misled - by reading Campaign. When I used to help with graduate recruitment we counted it as a factor against the candidate if they professed to be keen Campaign readers!
- yes a lot of ideas are poor/lazy. Not all 'creatives' are magicians - far from it. There are bad creatives just as there are bad account directors, strategists, media planners etc as in any job.
- the concentration on yoof is partly a result of something I referred to before - the culture of creatives is a very young/laddish one so the work often reflects that. Also a huge proportion of people in agencies - and their clients - are 20 somethings.
- advertising tampons in a truck programme isn't necessarily daft. As a proportion of the total audience women will be a lower fraction than for Emmerdale say, but there will still be a certain number and the (low) rate paid will reflect that. TV is in any case a notoriously blunt targeting medium compared with say a magazine, even for niche satellite channels. Bear in mind where the TV set is, and that someone's partner/mum/daughter may be in the room. I can't stand Top Gear but I may watch to keep my wife company who is a fan (and she has zero interest in cars which tells you a lot about Top Gear). Oh and another problem is that the actual measurement of who is watching a TV programme is notoriously flawed, and the accuracy is only getting worse now we have more than one commercial channel, not to mention Sky+, internet, 3G....
- I never had the maths to do theoretical physics either (ultimately Physics is Geometry as my old lecturer used to say), which is why I got into advertising instead!
Cheers,
Adrian