Porsche Enthusiasts Club Forum

It is currently Tue Jul 08, 2025 6:31 am
Classic Line Insurance


All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: A bit cheesed off.
PostPosted: Mon Mar 21, 2016 10:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:32 pm
Posts: 134
TIPEC membership: 0
Hi Guys,

I've owned my 944 2.7l for the past 4 years, undertaking a slow renovation.
Part of me always felt that the engine had been changed at some point, well to my disappointment tonight I finally found the engine number, which shows my engine to be a 1986 2.5 instead of a 2.7 :roll: should I be disappointed??
I feel a bit cheesed off!!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A bit cheesed off.
PostPosted: Tue Mar 22, 2016 12:01 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin

Joined: Thu Jan 01, 1970 12:00 am
Posts: 5518
Location: Rochester, Kent
TIPEC membership: 911
If you have enjoyed the car for four years, does it really make a big difference to the smile she puts on your face?

_________________
Kent & South East London R.O

Join the Club

Silver 1989 911 Speedster
Midnight Blue 2004 996 C4S Cab
Tahoe Blue 1990 964 C2
Zenith Blue 1998 BoxsterSold
Guards Red 1992 944 S2 Cab gone but not forgotten
Mediterranean Blue BMW 530e


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A bit cheesed off.
PostPosted: Tue Mar 22, 2016 3:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:58 am
Posts: 701
Location: Yateley, Hampshire.
TIPEC membership: 6489
I can't see how it makes much real-world difference. The performance of the 2.5l and 2.7l engines never differed by much. All these years later, a "good" 2.5 will probably out-perform a "middling" 2.7. Condition will count for more than displacement.

In the "collector's car" world, people do care about matching chassis and engine numbers. Thankfully that hasn't percolated down to the 944 yet.

_________________
Glenn
944 S2 ("Trigger")
944 2.7 road-legal track-day car ("Doris") [Sold]


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A bit cheesed off.
PostPosted: Tue Mar 22, 2016 3:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:29 pm
Posts: 148
Location: Whitehaven
TIPEC membership: 0
I'd be more than cheesed off I be bloody furious. I don't think it has anything to do with performance it's the fact that you've been cheated and lied to. I had this when buying a supposed 2.8 cologne v6 engine but when I turned up it had 2.3 cast on the side.

_________________
1984 924 2.0 n/a crystal Green - The daily
2005 VW Passat tdi 130 Highline, now 170bhp & 290ft/lb
2000 Peugeot 406 2.0 hdi - stood for 4 years, fresh mot and mostly working.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A bit cheesed off.
PostPosted: Tue Mar 22, 2016 7:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 7:16 pm
Posts: 1891
Location: UK
TIPEC membership: 0
DICKO74 wrote:
Hi Guys,

I've owned my 944 2.7l for the past 4 years, undertaking a slow renovation.
Part of me always felt that the engine had been changed at some point, well to my disappointment tonight I finally found the engine number, which shows my engine to be a 1986 2.5 instead of a 2.7 :roll: should I be disappointed??
I feel a bit cheesed off!!


YES, a 2.7 engine is worth much more than a 2.5.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A bit cheesed off.
PostPosted: Wed Mar 23, 2016 9:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2015 8:27 pm
Posts: 29
TIPEC membership: 0
I've recently joined the 2.7 owners club and I'd be cheesed off if I'd found out it was a 2.5. Mind you maybe I should check. lol. I was told by one of the independents that a 2.7 could be more of a pain to own than a regular 2.5 due to the scarcity of some of the parts. He even went so far as to say that he wouldn't recommend a beginner owning one. In saying that this was about the time I was thinking of selling due to finding rampant sill rot internally... Maybe he wanted it cheap. :) Either way I'm glad I kept it


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A bit cheesed off.
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 1:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:34 pm
Posts: 190
TIPEC membership: 0
I'd be livid. Not from a performance point of view but from having bought something and then to find out its not what was advertised.

That said if you've enjoyed the car for the last 4 years I don't think the bad mood would last for long. Get out and drive it :D


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A bit cheesed off.
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 2:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 7:09 pm
Posts: 840
2.5 is easier to work on and parts are readily available...my preferred engine.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A bit cheesed off.
PostPosted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2013 11:32 pm
Posts: 134
TIPEC membership: 0
Thanks guys, for your views.
When the engine was changed, would the clutch have been changed to a 2.5l spec?

Thanks


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: A bit cheesed off.
PostPosted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 6:53 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 8:34 am
Posts: 531
Location: Peterborough
TIPEC membership: 7496
It's the same clutch mate.

_________________
Porsche 944 2.7 Sold March 2018
Audi A6 3.0TDI LeMans Daily driver
Porsche 911 997 Carrera S in slate grey Purchased October 2018


ARO Peterborough Region


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group