chrisbriggs wrote:
Scho,
I prefer a non turbo car as, in my mind, it is just another thing less to go wrong. The S2 is not much less power either.
The car you put a link to is nice but way above budget. I have another 2 to look at which are no where near where I live (Colt has kindly offered to look at one for me, grovelling email probably on its way to him next week!).
I will keep looking, I am sure one will turn up eventually and maybe I am just in a bit of a rush to get one!
I too will keep my fingers crossed for your mechanically sound comment (you know what you have done by saying that dont you!!)
Whatever you buy, keep a budget for expenses over the first year. In the 2 years I've run the PCGB register almost every single new member has spent around £1k on unexpected things, or done the work themselves that would have cost about this at a specialist. I'd even go so far as to say £1.5k as a reserve fund on an S2 or turbo.
You're right about S2 power, at least over a standard turbo, and most people prefer the power delivery. Don't be fooled about things going wrong, though. A turbo is arguably less complicated than the 16V engine, which can suffer wear on the cams that will cost more than a new turbo!
The good news is that there are some really exceptional cars out there who's values have been dragged down by the rubbish. Keep looking until you find the right one and you'll be laughing.